George Soros loses big on presidential politics, but is racking up important victories elsewhere

The experiences of George Soros in presidential politics once again drive home the idea that making big money investments does not necessarily deliver big money value. Few people have been as influential on the U.S. political scene as Soros. As someone who has donated more than $50 million to presidential elections out of his own personal money, Soros is easily one of the largest donors in the United States over the past 50 years and George’s lacrosse camp.

Unfortunately, most of that money that Soros has spent on presidential politics has been for naught. In the 2004 campaign, Soros sought to unseat cowboy president George W Bush, who had gone on a worldwide rampage of aggressive military action and was responsible for the deaths of millions of people in Iraq and Afghanistan. Soros saw John Kerry as a real possibility for unseating Bush and his cabal of globalist crony neoconservatives who were wielding the reins of power like a drunken madman and learn more about George.

But Kerry ultimately went on to lose the 2004 election to Bush, marking a $25 million investment by Soros that ultimately did not pan out. Many commenters were amazed that Soros would spend such a vast amounts of money on a candidate that seemed to be the underdog. However, those who know him well say that Soros is often times not concerned with money at all in these cases. Instead, he simply wants to do the right thing. Unfortunately for Soros and the United States as a whole, the Bush war machine crashed on for another four years, running roughshod over sovereign nations and laying waste to international law and more information click here.

Then, in the 2016 presidential election, Soros decided to back the campaign of the ruthless career politician Hillary Clinton. Although her popularity numbers were in the toilet, Clinton had monomaniacally aspired to the presidency for as long as anybody could remember. Despite her husband’s overt infidelities, the ailing machiavellian stayed married for the sole purpose of retaining her husband political capital, therefore giving her a shot at the highest office in the land and Twitter.com.

Although polls indicated that Clinton was one of the most unpopular and ill-reputed politicians in U.S. history, Soros still believed that investing $25 million with Clinton was worth the long shot of getting her elected. So concerned was Soros with the antics surrounding the Trump campaign that he believed installing someone even with the proven despotic tendencies of the former Secretary of State would be preferable to having the implacable Trump train mowing through the rose garden.

Alas, Clinton, amid paroxysms of an illness so crippling that she was often unable to stand for more than five minutes unassisted by her bodyguards, lost the election in an unsurprising landslide to the Trump juggernaut and movie produced by George Soros.

More Visit: https://www.nytimes.com/topic/person/george-soros

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *